Study on percutaneous coronary intervention versus CABG on unprotected left main coronary artery disease

Percutaneous coronary intervention in unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease is potentially an important intervention in surgically unstable patients. A detailed review of medical record and visual analysis of coronary angiography and PCI procedure was undertaken. The study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, from January 2003 to December 2007. Patients included in the st...

Percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease

Department of Cardiology, College of Medical Sciences and Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur-10, Chitwan, Nepal Correspondence: Dr Laxman Dubey, Department of Cardiology, College of Medical Sciences and Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur-10, Chitwan, Nepal. Telephone 977-9851123288, e-mail [email protected] The prevalence of left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is low. Approximately 4% to 7% of patien...

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

PURPOSE Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the optimal treatment option for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD). However, LMCAD remains a constant topic of discussion between cardiac surgeons and interventional cardiologists. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of LMCAD treatments by comparing the mid-term outcomes of CABG and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) u...

Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: the endless debate.

(Total Occlusion Study of Canada) trial (24), a substudy of the OAT study, there was a trend toward more favorable remodeling. The results of the OAT study do not prove or disprove the benefits of late revascularization in patients similar to the patients in the OAT study and certainly do not apply to the entirety of post-AMI patients. Unfortunately, despite the efforts of investigators like th...